Archive for December, 2006

Do not downgrade marketing

Saturday, December 30th, 2006

Up till now, whether in Singapore or here in China, I often come across the question - what’s marketing? Or what’s the difference between sales and marketing? Isn’t it the same? In an attempt to translate the word “Marketing” into Chinese, I have a long list of different terms that contribute further to the confusion! Interestingly, from my personal experience and observation here, the mis-interpretation of marketing goes in different stages: 1) it is sales- just another fancy name for sales; 2) it is sales support- producing materials to support sales sell better; 3) it is advertising - this is especially true for FMCG companies; 4) it is market research - information center of the company; 5) it is planning - scheduling and executing all the activities of the year; 6) it is business development - in charge of expanding the business; 7) it is PR - voice of the company and to attend to media.

So, what’s marketing? It is surprising that the term “marketing” can be confusing as the world does not lack good definition of marketing, from marketing gurus to professors to practicians. In my narrow practice of marketing, I would like to view marketing as “Concentrating the company’s Capabilities on Consistently Channeling & serving targeted Customers’ needs & wants against Competitive forces.” Concentrate- strategically map the market out and prioritize. Capabilities - resources and core competences suitably matching the key success factors for the industry. Consistently- build and enhance the brand and image through constant desired customer experiences. Channeling and serving - reaching and totally satisfying the customers at all different customer touch points. Customers’ needs and wants - requirements and aspirations of all stakeholders involved in the influencing and decision making process. Competitive - everything should be done in relative to the key players and upcoming players in the industry. I believe that marketing should be the integration of everything from formulating customer centric strategy to value driven planning and most importantly, carefully and diligently implementing strategy. Pix Winston Web low res2.jpgWinston Nyo General Manager, Village Earth Pte Ltd

Branding: Promise vs Prestige

Monday, December 25th, 2006

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! With all the festive mood of buying and giving, it would be hard for a marketer not to notice brand buying behavior around.

In Asia and especially here in China, branding is taking a very unique form.

I have always learned and believe that branding is about delivering the promise of the brand’s position in the minds of targeted customers. I was very naive to believe that “promise” is about quality, design and image. I used to believe that the promise of quality was most critical. I was proven wrong. The market in China is not short of examples where prestige outweighs promise. Customers are more concerned with face than with fulfillment. Often, the request for delivery is confusing and conflicting.

We have been dealing with corporate using cultural festivals to build customer relationship with gifts. An example would be the mid-autumn festival or what we call the moon cake festival back in Singapore. Customers had always requested that the gift set should be unique, ie different from others. Yet, it must carry the moon cake that is a long time brand, ie same as everyone. The definition of a “branded” moon cake that it must be acceptable by the general public. Customers had often requested for long time well known brands, which should be strong market leader. Going to the retail shops to hunt for this brand, we saw an unbelievable sight at the retail store. Checking out a long time leading moon cake brand, not only it was not individually packed like other brands, it was packed in very “cheap”looking box! But this is what customers prefer over a high quality well packed moon cakes (where the factory exports its moon cakes to Europe and the US). To boggle the mind further, after asking those who have received moon cakes in the past, 8 out of 10 Chinese do not eat or like to eat the moon cake. However, they would be upset if they do not receive the moon cake or if it is not a branded moon cake.

If I take the well developed scientific steps to evaluate a brand, or diligently carry out a conjoint analysis market research to map out the consumers’ AIO and preferences, I am not sure how it can help me develop a offensive marketing plan. Understanding Asian customers, especially here in China, it is seldom sufficient to just go through extensive market research. Customers being researched will often answer what they think or feel they are expected to answer. A totally professional but naive simplified look into the rationality of the market would not give companies the picture of the market they should see. To truly understand the customers, one have no choice but to literally live and breath with them. This will ensure successful marketing and branding.

Pix Winston Web low res2.jpgWinston Nyo

General Manager, Village Earth Pte Ltd

“To outsource or not to outsource?”

Saturday, December 23rd, 2006

That is the question!

Merry Christmas everybody! I would like to start off my blogging life with the spirit of the Christmas season, and I sincerely hope to share and learn from this new world of networks without barriers that we live in today!

With globalization and rationalizing of resources, companies around the world are in a frantic race to out beat their competitors on gaining an edge in cost and in value. Questions are getting more difficult and answers are getting more complicated! Running an enterprise today is NOT easier, it is getting complicated. First, managing TQM and lean manufacturing is critical to deliver quality products, then branding becomes important to differentiate from competitors, then the right talent with the right process design are critical in delivering that promise, then innovation must continue to keep the competitive advantage abreast, then companies need to outsource to leverage on global resources and the list goes on and on. To make business life more “interesting”, each must??and should comes with it a “dark side” after companies adopted the new “business to-do-list”!

However, it is a very different here in Asia and especially here in China. It is unthinkable to outsource. Instead, entrepreneurs rushed to in-source and vertically integrate whenever possible. Why let someone else make the money when we can make the money? Why should we pay so much to our suppliers? Can we do what our suppliers do?

Companies should major in the major. Business must learn the art of paradoxical balance. Be focus and specialized in what one is good at and expand in that area! The start of the journey should come from knowing and growing the companies core competence against competitions addressing key success factors of the industry. Every industry requires a different set of critical capabilities to win the game and enterprises should match its core competence to that before considering outsourcing. As a start, many companies are ignorant or the industry’s critical capabilities and “blind” to its core competence. Simply, core competences are well-performed activities that are central to a company’s competitiveness and profitability.

It is quite common that companies struggle with the right core competence required to win in the industry and matching the company’s unique capability to deliver that better than its competitors. As I read into a very good article, “Strategic sourcing from periphery to the core by Mark Gottfredson, Rudy Puryear and Steven Phillips Harvard Business Review February 2005″, I realize that my own company and my clients should strategically and systematically map out the proprietary nature of the process or function against the uniqueness of business process or function and the company’s ability to perform function against cost per transaction. Only when an enterprise is clear about the consequences of the company’s decision to capture a critical competence that would give the company the competitive advantage when delivering value to their customer through in-source or outsource should a company consider the knowledge lost in outsourcing. On top of that, it is not necessary true that by outsourcing a function, a company would loose control, knowledge or capability of that function. On the contrary, I have experienced otherwise. By being the marketing department of clients where sales and production or supply chain and merchandizing are at the core of the company, their organization learned to carry out marketing activities never been done before.

Outsourcing usually failed because it was done purely for cost savings and when it is done piece meal. Besides cost savings, companies should also look at the value of it. Sometimes, it could be to transform the organization or even the industry. Outsourcing itself is nothing wrong, it is just how a company chose to outsource or in-source.

Pix Winston Web low res2.jpgWinston Nyo

General Manager, Village Earth Pte Ltd